noun a formal interrogation of a witness by the opposing party in a court case
In psychology research, cross examination may involve questioning participants to validate the results of a study or to uncover any inconsistencies in their responses.
In the field of law, cross examination refers to the questioning of a witness by the opposing party's attorney in a court case to test the credibility of the witness and the truthfulness of their testimony.
In journalism, cross examination can refer to the process of questioning sources or interviewees to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information they provide.
In competitive debate settings, cross examination is a period during which one team can ask questions of the opposing team to challenge their arguments and evidence.
In forensic investigations, cross examination may be used during interviews or interrogations to verify the accuracy of statements made by witnesses or suspects.
Cross examination is commonly used by lawyers during trials to question witnesses presented by the opposing party in order to challenge their credibility, test their knowledge of the facts, and ultimately weaken their testimony.
Journalists may use cross examination techniques during interviews to push for more information, challenge inconsistencies, and ensure the accuracy of the information provided by the interviewee.
Police detectives may use cross examination when interrogating suspects to uncover inconsistencies in their statements, test their alibis, and gather more evidence to build a case against them.
In disciplinary hearings or investigations, HR managers may conduct cross examination of employees involved to gather all relevant information, verify the facts, and make informed decisions based on the findings.