In science, 'a priori' assumptions are often made in theoretical models before empirical data is collected.
In philosophy, 'a priori' refers to knowledge that is independent of experience, such as mathematical truths or logical principles.
In epistemology, 'a priori' knowledge is contrasted with 'a posteriori' knowledge, which is derived from experience.
In logic, 'a priori' reasoning involves deducing conclusions from premises without the need for empirical evidence.
In mathematics, 'a priori' refers to knowledge that is known to be true without the need for empirical verification.
In literature and philosophy, writers may use the term 'a priori' to refer to knowledge or arguments that are based on reasoning or principles that are independent of experience.
Psychologists may use the term 'a priori' when discussing certain innate cognitive abilities or biases that are present in individuals from birth, without the need for prior learning or experience.
In philosophy, the term 'a priori' is commonly used to distinguish between knowledge that is derived from reason alone, without the need for empirical evidence, as opposed to a posteriori knowledge which is based on experience.
Mathematicians may use 'a priori' to refer to certain mathematical truths or axioms that are considered self-evident and do not require proof or verification.
In legal contexts, 'a priori' may be used to describe legal principles or rights that are considered to be fundamental and inherent, without the need for specific legal precedent or case law.