noun a Latin phrase that means 'to the person' and is used to describe an argument that attacks a person's character or traits instead of focusing on the issue at hand
Used in logical arguments to describe a fallacy where a person's character or traits are attacked instead of addressing the argument itself.
Relevant in discussions on cognitive biases and logical fallacies when analyzing how individuals may resort to ad hominem attacks in arguments.
Can be used in legal arguments to discredit a witness by attacking their character rather than focusing on the evidence presented.
Commonly used to point out when someone is attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
In the field of journalism, writers may use ad hominem attacks to discredit or undermine the credibility of a person they are writing about, rather than addressing the actual argument or issue at hand.
Psychologists may encounter ad hominem attacks in therapy sessions or when conducting research. It is important for psychologists to address these attacks professionally and focus on the underlying issues rather than personal attacks.
Politicians often use ad hominem attacks against their opponents in political debates or campaigns to discredit them and sway public opinion. However, this can be seen as a sign of weakness and may backfire.
Lawyers may encounter ad hominem arguments in court when opposing counsel attacks their character rather than addressing the legal issues at hand. It is important for lawyers to remain focused on the facts and legal arguments.
Teachers may encounter ad hominem attacks from students who are frustrated or upset. It is important for teachers to address these attacks calmly and professionally, focusing on the behavior or issue at hand rather than engaging in personal attacks.