noun a person who is appointed to present arguments against a proposed canonization or beatification in the Roman Catholic Church
In philosophical debates, advocatus diaboli can be used as a rhetorical device to present counterarguments or challenge prevailing beliefs or assumptions.
In legal contexts, advocatus diaboli may refer to a defense attorney who takes on controversial or unpopular cases, often advocating for the side that goes against societal norms or expectations.
In the context of the Catholic Church, the advocatus diaboli is the devil's advocate, a role in the canonization process to present arguments against the canonization of a candidate for sainthood.
In debates or discussions, advocatus diaboli refers to a person who takes on the role of arguing against a commonly held belief or position in order to stimulate critical thinking and deepen the conversation.
In literature, the term 'advocatus diaboli' may be used to refer to a character who presents arguments against the protagonist or in favor of the antagonist, challenging the status quo and creating conflict within the story.
In psychology, the concept of 'advocatus diaboli' can be applied to the practice of cognitive behavioral therapy, where therapists may encourage patients to consider alternative perspectives or challenging thoughts in order to promote cognitive restructuring and emotional growth.
In legal contexts, the term 'advocatus diaboli' may be used to describe a defense attorney who takes on controversial or unpopular cases in order to challenge the prosecution's arguments and ensure a fair trial for their client.
In journalism, 'advocatus diaboli' can refer to the practice of presenting opposing viewpoints or playing devil's advocate in order to provide a balanced and comprehensive analysis of a news story or issue.