adjective characterized by vague or exaggerated gestures or language, especially to avoid addressing an issue or problem directly
In philosophy, 'handwavy' is used to denote arguments that are superficial or lacking in depth.
In mathematics, 'handwavy' is used to refer to proofs or explanations that rely on intuition rather than rigorous formalism.
In academic research, the term 'handwavy' is used to describe arguments or explanations that lack concrete evidence or logical reasoning.
In scientific discourse, 'handwavy' is used to criticize vague or unsubstantiated claims or theories.
In the field of writing, 'handwavy' may be used to describe a piece of writing that lacks concrete evidence or support, relying instead on vague or unsubstantiated claims.
Psychologists may use the term 'handwavy' to criticize a theory or approach that lacks empirical support or scientific rigor, relying on speculative or unfounded ideas.
Scientists may use 'handwavy' to critique a study or research that lacks methodological rigor or fails to provide sufficient evidence to support its conclusions.
Engineers may use 'handwavy' to describe a solution or design that lacks detailed technical specifications or fails to address critical engineering principles.
In academic contexts, 'handwavy' may be used to criticize a presentation, argument, or paper that lacks depth, thorough analysis, or proper citation of sources.