verb to be valid or sound; to stand up to scrutiny or criticism
In the field of science, the term 'hold water' is used to describe a theory or hypothesis that is logical and valid based on evidence and reasoning.
Within philosophy, 'hold water' is used to assess the coherence and logical consistency of a particular philosophical argument or theory.
In legal contexts, 'hold water' is used to determine the strength and validity of an argument or evidence presented in a case.
When discussing debates or arguments, 'hold water' is used to evaluate the validity and soundness of a particular point or claim.
In the context of writing, the phrase 'hold water' is used to describe whether an argument or theory is valid and logical. A writer may use this phrase to assess the strength of their own arguments or those presented by others in their work.
Psychologists may use the term 'hold water' when evaluating the validity of a theory or hypothesis in their research or clinical practice. It can signify whether an idea is supported by evidence and reasoning, or if it lacks credibility.
Lawyers may use the expression 'hold water' to refer to the strength of a legal argument or defense. It is essential for a lawyer to ensure that their arguments are sound and can withstand scrutiny in court.
In the scientific community, 'hold water' is used to assess the validity of a hypothesis or research findings. Scientists must ensure that their conclusions are supported by data and can withstand peer review.
Educators may use the term 'hold water' when evaluating the logic and coherence of students' arguments or explanations. It is important for students to develop critical thinking skills and construct well-supported arguments.