noun a type of urban design that aims to prevent people from lingering or resting in public spaces
adjective referring to the design or implementation of hostile architecture
Hostile architecture is used in urban planning to deter certain behaviors in public spaces, such as loitering or sleeping, by using designs that are uncomfortable or inconvenient for individuals.
Hostile architecture is often criticized in social justice discussions for its impact on marginalized populations, as it can further marginalize individuals experiencing homelessness or poverty.
In architecture, hostile architecture refers to design elements that are intentionally implemented to prevent specific activities, such as sitting or lying down, in certain areas.
Hostile architecture may be addressed in public policy discussions regarding the use of public spaces and the rights of individuals to access and use these spaces without discrimination.
In environmental psychology, hostile architecture can be studied in terms of its effects on human behavior and well-being in public spaces.
Writers may use the concept of hostile architecture in their work to explore themes of exclusion, control, and power dynamics in urban environments. They may write articles, essays, or fiction pieces that critique the use of hostile architecture and its impact on marginalized communities.
Psychologists may study the effects of hostile architecture on mental health and well-being. They may conduct research to understand how the presence of hostile architecture in public spaces can contribute to feelings of anxiety, isolation, and insecurity among individuals who are already vulnerable or marginalized.
Urban planners may consider the use of hostile architecture in designing public spaces. They may assess the ethical implications of incorporating hostile architectural elements and explore alternative design solutions that prioritize inclusivity, accessibility, and community well-being.