noun a policy or practice of refusing to allow a person or group to speak or be heard at a public event
verb to prevent someone from speaking or being heard at a public event
In the field of social activism, 'no-platform' refers to the practice of refusing to provide a platform or opportunity for individuals or groups with controversial or harmful views to speak or spread their ideas.
Within online communities, 'no-platform' is often employed to describe the act of banning or blocking individuals who promote hate speech, misinformation, or other harmful content.
In political discourse, 'no-platform' can be seen as a strategy to limit the influence of extremist or fringe groups by denying them a platform to share their views with a wider audience.
In higher education, 'no-platform' is used to describe the decision by universities or student groups to prevent certain speakers from giving talks or lectures on campus due to their controversial beliefs or statements.
In the field of journalism, a writer may face the concept of 'no-platform' when discussing controversial topics or inviting certain individuals for interviews or speaking engagements. This term refers to the decision to deny a platform or opportunity for someone to express their views due to their controversial or harmful beliefs.
Psychologists may encounter the term 'no-platform' when dealing with clients who hold extreme or harmful beliefs. In such cases, psychologists may need to consider ethical implications of providing a platform for such beliefs or behaviors, and may choose to restrict or limit opportunities for expression of those beliefs within the therapeutic context.