noun the practice of preventing someone from speaking or participating in public events or debates, typically due to their controversial or offensive views
On social media platforms, no-platforming can involve banning or restricting individuals or groups from sharing their opinions or content.
In political activism, no-platforming is used as a strategy to silence or marginalize individuals or groups with opposing ideologies.
At public events, no-platforming may be employed to prevent certain speakers from addressing the audience based on their beliefs or statements.
In online communities, no-platforming can be used to remove individuals who engage in harmful or offensive behavior from participating in discussions or activities.
In academic institutions, no-platforming refers to the practice of denying someone a platform to speak or participate in events due to their controversial views or actions.
In the writing community, no-platforming may be used to prevent controversial or offensive speakers from participating in events or conferences, in order to maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all attendees.
Psychologists may use no-platforming as a way to limit the exposure of harmful or pseudoscientific ideas within their field, by refusing to engage with or provide a platform for individuals promoting such ideas.
In academia, no-platforming can be used to challenge speakers or scholars with views that are deemed to be discriminatory, harmful, or against the values of the institution, by refusing to host or endorse their presentations or lectures.
Journalists may choose to no-platform individuals or groups that spread misinformation or hate speech, by not providing them with a platform for their views in news articles, interviews, or opinion pieces.
Politicians may support or participate in efforts to no-platform individuals or organizations that promote extremist ideologies or incite violence, in order to protect public safety and uphold democratic values.