noun a situation in which feelings and personal beliefs have more influence on public opinion than facts and evidence
In the realm of politics, the term 'post-truth' is used to describe a political culture in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebut
In philosophy, 'post-truth' is used to discuss the concept that truth is no longer an absolute, but rather a subjective interpretation shaped by personal beliefs and emotions.
In sociology, 'post-truth' is relevant in analyzing how social constructs and group dynamics can influence the acceptance of information regardless of its factual accuracy.
Within media studies, 'post-truth' refers to the phenomenon where objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.
Writers may use the concept of 'post-truth' to explore the manipulation of facts and the blurring of reality in their works of fiction or non-fiction.
Psychologists may study the impact of 'post-truth' narratives on individuals' beliefs, behaviors, and mental health, as well as develop strategies to combat misinformation and promote critical thinking.
Journalists may analyze how 'post-truth' rhetoric is used in politics, media, and public discourse, and strive to uphold journalistic integrity by fact-checking and providing accurate information to the public.
Politicians may employ 'post-truth' tactics to manipulate public opinion, discredit opponents, or advance their agendas, leading to increased polarization and distrust in the political system.
Educators may teach students how to discern credible sources, think critically about information, and resist the influence of 'post-truth' narratives in order to cultivate informed and responsible citizens.