noun a detail or circumstance that is not essential but is helpful in understanding a situation
adjective describing or pertaining to circumstances or details that are not essential but are helpful in understanding a situation
Writers use circumstantial details to create a realistic setting or atmosphere in their stories, enhancing the reader's experience.
Historians may use circumstantial evidence to piece together events or relationships based on indirect clues or information.
In psychology, circumstantial thinking refers to a thought process that includes excessive detail and irrelevant information, making it difficult to reach a conclusion.
In legal contexts, circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It can be used to establish guilt or innocence in criminal cases.
In medical diagnosis, circumstantial evidence may point to a specific illness or condition based on indirect symptoms or observations.
Journalists may rely on circumstantial evidence to uncover hidden truths or connections in their investigations.
Forensic experts often analyze circumstantial evidence such as fingerprints, footprints, and DNA to build a case in criminal investigations.
In writing, 'circumstantial' is often used to describe evidence or information that is indirect or inferred rather than directly observed or proven.
Psychologists may use the term 'circumstantial' when discussing how certain factors or situations may influence behavior or mental health outcomes.
Lawyers may refer to 'circumstantial evidence' when presenting a case that relies on indirect evidence to make a point.
Detectives may consider circumstantial evidence when investigating a crime, piecing together various clues or information to form a conclusion.
Scientists may use 'circumstantial data' to support a hypothesis or theory, indicating evidence that indirectly supports their findings.
Journalists may use 'circumstantial information' when reporting on a story, providing context or background details that are not directly confirmed.
Historians may analyze circumstantial evidence to piece together events or understand historical contexts that are not explicitly documented.
Forensic analysts may consider circumstantial evidence when examining a crime scene or analyzing physical evidence that indirectly points to a suspect.
Risk analysts may evaluate circumstantial factors when assessing potential threats or vulnerabilities in a system or organization.
Medical examiners may take into account circumstantial information when determining cause of death, considering various factors that may have contributed to a person's demise.